Green Earth Technologies (GETG) against ASAHI KASEI Cor/ADR (AHKSY) Critical Review | Light Senstive Infusion Set

In the fourth section Perovskite Solar Cells Sales , report covers the SWOT analysis of the market to identify the growth opportunities, limitations to the Perovskite Solar Cells Sales market growth. The comparative study of Perovskite Solar Cells Sales based on the top players, their production capacity, consumer volume forecast from 2018-2023.

348. In any event, the value of these emails to the Board in 2011 would not be tarnished by Isaacs having solicited them. It was never for Isaacs to ‘prove his innocence’ to misuse a frequent phrase. One issue had been raised as hearsay and another four questions had been asked (all of which were hearsay or out of thin air) – whoever was making hearsay comments or innuendo had to show there was any value or substance thereto before Isaacs, in a properly constituted Disciplinary Enquiry, should have needed to respond (if he chose so to do). And what was written to the Board was subsequent to the work of the Human resources Subcommittee.

171. However, organizational design, revisiting organizational culture, addressing toxic issues are not within our capacity as a Panel. In any event, Equal Education has informed 62 a number of persons and entities, including the WLC, and has caused to be published a statement that they have established a broader assessment process “which will examine the organization’s record of dealing with mistreatment in the workplace, its policies and procedures with regard to sexual harassment and the organizational norms and culture”63.

The most commonly reported adverse events, across both trials and all treatment groups, were cough, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and back pain. In addition, the companies completed a 12-month, phase 3, open-label safety study versus tiotropium, in which no new safety issues were identified. Rates of adverse events in the study were low and comparable to those in the tiotropium arm.

c. Could the Human Resources Subcommittee contact any one of them when they were no more than the subject of malicious rumours about them (not Isaacs)? Should the Human Resources Subcommittee not wait for evidence of some sort to be given or some detail or evidence ( as to connection with EE, connection with Isaacs) before even contemplating any duty towards anyone? And before recommending that the Equal Education Code and Practices and Policies be utilized?

– The primary factors estimated to drive the Global In-Line Water Filter Market for the forecasting period 2018-2025.

“I believe the fire was reported. Also, Alper said that Walus represented himself as an FBI agent and told him he could have a Mexican kill Alper at any time for $500.”

309. All the members of the Human Resources Subcommittee have joined in a submission pointing out that each has described the great discomfort which they would have felt in reaching out to women who had not lodged complaints directly or indirectly and where the only grounds for approaching any one of them was discomfort expressed by Hasson about “rumours’ he had heard. Absent any concrete fact or any prima facie evidence presented to the Human Resources Subcommittee, the Subcommittee felt that contacting any one of these women would have been a serious breach of their privacy.

d. Insofar as ‘Jane’ writes, in the second paragraph of her message of 24th March, that “it wasn’t very pretty and there were threats from his side”, it is worth noting that this sentence is preceded and followed by reference to ‘Jane’s’ comment/question being taken (according to her) “out of context”. Achmat told the Panel that he had no idea of the content of such threats but that he understood the whole issue to be in the context of the failure to produce work for which ‘Jane’ had been paid. I would have thought it was also possible that she was placing these “personal issues” in the context of the ‘Jewish intellectual’ comment/question which she had posed because that is subject matter which both preceded and succeeded her reference to any threat. There is no reference to any of this background or personal animus in the Mail & Guardian article.

I fear that behind your make-up there is pain and security – do not let it stop you from earning a living (please help SACTWU/Cosatu come into the 21th Century with media), do not let it stop you from becoming an activist leader. [my underlining]

10 This report deals later with the terms and conditions pertaining to privacy on which these submissions were presented.

291. The Terms of Reference formulated by Achmat did ask for provision of evidence “by those people who are spreading the rumours or making the allegations” but no such persons had come forward. It is unlikely that those who were involved in what Hasson had called the “rumours” did not know of the contribution they could make. After all, Achmat and Hasson were in touch and these persons (Sack, Hasson, Fischer, Mackintosh, Kelly Rosenthal, Kira Schlesinger). Perhaps they did not take ownership of the ‘rumours’ when it came to the crunch? Perhaps they appreciated that they had only hearsay information which they had been repeating their as their “rumours” rather than being able to produce any direct evidence? This Panel does not know because we have not been given any reason for the absence of any of these persons in coming forward at any time.